This summary is intended to provide a snapshot of the original research. It is in no way a substitute for the original research article, nor is it intended to be a complete reflection of the original research.
Originally published in JAMA Paediatrics, 8 April 2024
Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) outcomes.
This nonrandomized controlled trial compared infants diagnosed through newborn screening with those diagnosed after symptom onset. Data from 234 children with genetically confirmed SMA revealed that those screened at birth achieved motor milestones significantly earlier and had better functional outcomes compared to clinically diagnosed infants.
The newborn screening cohort started treatment at a mean age of 1.3 months, while the clinical symptom onset group began treatment at 10.7 months.
Access the Original Trial
Schwartz, O., Vill, K., Pfaffenlehner, M., Behrens, M., Weiß, C., Johannsen, J., Friese, J., Hahn, A., Ziegler, A., Illsinger, S., Smitka, M., von Moers, A., Kölbel, H., Schreiber, G., Kaiser, N., Wilichowski, E., Flotats-Bastardas, M., Husain, R. A., Baumann, M., Köhler, C., … SMARTCARE study group (2024). Clinical Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA pediatrics, e240492. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0492
Disclaimer
This article is compiled from various resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work. Every effort has been made to attribute quotes and content correctly. Where possible, all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us
Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.