In Brief | Transplant Medicine

Transplant Medicine: Immunosuppression Optimisation in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results from the OPTIMIZE Trial

[DD Month 2026]

 Time to Read: 01:15
Keywords: Kidney Transplantation Older Recipients, Immunosuppression EverolimusCalcineuron-Inhibitors
Key Finding: Routine calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimisation with everolimus conferred no benefit over standard tacrolimus-MMF therapy in de novo kidney transplant recipients aged ≥65 years — successful transplantation occurred in 50% (TEP) vs 57% (TMP), with no significant difference (P=0.91).

Older kidney transplant recipients face a distinct risk profile — lower rejection risk but greater susceptibility to infection, malignancy, and Calcineurin Inhibitor(CNI) related nephrotoxicity, prompting interest in CNI-sparing regimens.

The OPTIMIZE trial randomised 379 de novo recipients aged 65 years and older to either low-dose tacrolimus with everolimus and prednisolone, or standard-dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone.

Despite achieving protocol-defined trough concentrations for both tacrolimus and everolimus, the CNI-minimisation arm showed no advantage: successful transplantation at two years occurred in 50% versus 57% of the standard-therapy arm, with identical patient survival (89% vs 89%) and similar graft survival (83% vs 84%). No significant differences emerged in kidney function, biopsy-proven acute rejection, infection rates, or outcomes within either donor-age stratum.

For clinicians managing older transplant recipients, these findings do not support a routine switch away from standard tacrolimus-MMF-based regimens for the sake of CNI minimisation alone.

Sanders JF, de Boer SE, Jonker J, et al. Immunosuppression in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2026;37(4):814–824. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.0000000924 | View original article
This is a brief overview of published research and does not replace the original study. The Medical Education Network encourages members to review the full article before forming clinical opinions. Every effort has been made to represent the findings accurately; the Medical Education Network cannot be held liable for any inaccuracies or omissions.
Rapid SSL

The Medical Education Network
Powered by eLecture, a VisualLive Solution