A case-based dialogue on BPH management — examining where PAE fits in the treatment algorithm and what the evidence tells us about patient selection, outcomes, and quality of life.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia is among the most prevalent conditions in men's health — so common it is almost considered an inevitability of ageing. By the sixth decade, more than half of men are living with the lower urinary tract symptoms it produces: frequency, urgency, incomplete emptying, and the slow erosion of sleep and quality of life that follows. Despite this, BPH management has remained largely formulaic for decades — a stepwise progression through alpha-blockers, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, and ultimately TURP. Each step carries trade-offs, and for many patients — particularly those with significant comorbidities or an active sexual life — the standard pathway is neither well-tolerated nor well-suited.
That picture is shifting. Prostatic artery embolisation has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative that challenges where PAE sits in the treatment algorithm — and for whom it may represent a first choice rather than a last resort. Recent randomised evidence, including the PARTEM trial, shows PAE can deliver clinically meaningful symptom reduction that outperforms combined medical therapy at nine months, while preserving sexual function in ways that pharmacological treatment frequently cannot. Yet traditional approaches retain an important role, and the clinical reality is that no single intervention suits every patient.
This session explores that evidence through real cases, with Interventional Radiologist, Dr Gareth Bydawell and Urologist Dr Mike Nicholls, focusing on patient selection, technical decision-making, and the evolving collaboration between urology and interventional radiology in defining what is achievable for each patient.
Two specialists, two disciplines — one shared commitment to advancing how South Africa manages BPH. Click any card to read the full biography.

