In Brief | Critical Care & Emergency Medicine | Gerontology


New Study Reviews Gender Differences In Injury Patterns and Clinical Presentation in the Elderly with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury


Time to read: 02:35
Time to listen: 05:21
 
Published on MedED: 2 July 2025
Originally Published: 19 June 2025

Source: International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Type of article: In Brief
MedED Catalogue Reference: MCCIB018
Category: Critical Care & Emergency Medicine
Cross Reference: Geriatrics, Neurology

Keywords: TBI, Geriatrics, sub-cranial haemorrhage, sub-arachnoid haemorrhage, mortality

 

Key Takeaway
The study found significant differences between male and female older adults with mild traumatic brain injury,  highlighting the need for gender-specific approaches in emergency assessment and management of geriatric mTBI patients.
 
Top

This article is a non-commercial summary based on the study: Šechný, P., et al. (2024). “Sex-specific patterns of injury and clinical presentation in older adults with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial bleeding: a retrospective cohort study.” International Journal of Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00565-5.Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 . No changes were made to the original findings. This article does not represent the original research, nor is it intended to replace the original research. Access the full Disclaimer Information.



Watch the 60-second summary

 


Listen to this Review

 



Study Context and Purpose


Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common emergency department diagnosis among the elderly, a population with complex physiological changes, increased frailty, and frequent comorbidities. 

Age-related factors such as brain atrophy and vascular fragility heighten the risk of complications, including intracranial bleeding, which occurs in approximately 5% of elderly mTBI cases.1

Evidence suggests that sex differences in brain structure, hormonal influences, and psychiatric history may influence injury patterns and outcomes, with older females more prone to persistent symptoms and poorer recovery.2,3


However, findings on sex-related differences in TBI remain inconsistent, and limited data exist on sex-specific presentations of geriatric mTBI complicated by intracranial bleeding. Understanding these differences is crucial for improving diagnosis and personalising care.


The Study in Summary

In this context, this retrospective cohort study conducted at Louis Pasteur University Hospital in Košice, Slovak Republic, investigated how gender influences injury patterns, clinical symptoms, and outcomes in older adults with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) complicated by intracranial bleeding. 

The study, published in the International Journal of Emergency Medicine, included 117 patients aged 65 years and older (62 males and 55 females), all of whom were admitted within 48 hours of injury.

The researchers found clear gender-related differences across several parameters including: 

 
Females tended to be older (median age: 80 vs. 75.5 years) and were more often injured at home, while males experienced more outdoor injuries. Ground-level falls were the most common mechanism of trauma in both groups.

Notably, clinical symptom presentation varied by sex: males more frequently exhibited amnesia and loss of consciousness, whereas females reported more diffuse or multiple concurrent symptoms, with no cases of loss of consciousness.

Skull fractures were more prevalent in males, while females had a higher incidence of limb and pelvic fractures. Subarachnoid and subdural haemorrhages were the most common types of intracranial bleeding in both sexes.

Most patients presented with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15, and most survived without neurological deficits.

In-hospital mortality was higher among male patients (9.7% vs. 3.6%).
 

Skull fractures were more prevalent in males, while females had a higher incidence of limb and pelvic fractures


Discussion

This study had several limitations. The relatively small sample size (117 patients) and retrospective, single-centre design introduce inherent biases and limit generalisability. Data collection relied on electronic health records, which may have led to underreporting or misclassification of key clinical variables such as symptoms, injury mechanisms, and discharge outcomes.

 Important prehospital factors—like comorbidities, medication adherence, and initial physiological parameters—were not systematically assessed. Although significant sex-based differences in injury patterns were identified, potential contributing factors (e.g., physiology, environment, and pre-existing conditions) were not fully explored. 

The geographic and institutional specificity of the cohort may further limit applicability, especially in the South African context, where healthcare access, diagnostic pathways, and admission criteria differ. Nonetheless, t
hese findings suggest important gender-related differences in how elderly patients present and respond to mTBI with intracranial bleeding, offering practical insights for emergency clinicians and guiding future sex-specific assessment strategies.


Original Study

Sedlak, M., Hutnanova, K., Petras, T. et al. Sex-stratified patterns in geriatric patients with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial bleeding: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Emerg Med 18, 107 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-025-00915-2



Additional References
 
 

Disclaimer
This article is compiled from several resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work.  Every effort has been made to attribute quotes and content correctly. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us 


Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.

Rapid SSL

The Medical Education Network
Powered by eLecture, a VisualLive Solution