In Brief |Paediatrics | Addiction Medicine


New Evidence Strengthens Link Between Cannabis Use in Pregnancy and Poor Birth Outcomes


Time to read: 01:53
Time to listen: 04:18
 
Published on MedED: 6 May 2025
Originally Published: 5 May 2025

Source: JAMA Paediatrics
Type of article: In Brief
MedED Catalogue Reference: MPIB022
Category: Paediatrics
Cross Reference: Addiction Medicine, Neonatal Care

Keywords: cannabis, neonatal outcomes, low birth weight, SGA, preterm

Key Takeaway
Prenatal cannabis exposure increases the risk of poor neonatal outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight, and perinatal mortality.
 
Top

This article is a review of recent studies originally published in the JAMA Paediatrics, 5 May 2025  This article does not represent the original research, nor is it intended to replace the original research. Access the full Disclaimer Information.

  

Watch the 60 Second Summary

(Please let us know if you like this format by clicking here)

 



Listen to Full Article

 



Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug globally, and its use is rising.

In South Africa, following the 2018 Constitutional Court ruling and the 2024 Cannabis for Private Purposes Act, personal use of cannabis has been decriminalised, shifting public perception and potentially increasing use among vulnerable groups. Studies show that up to 36% of South African youth aged 15–24 report recent cannabis use.1


Substance use during pregnancy is a significant public health concern in South Africa, where the use of multiple substances during pregnancy is common.2 In a survey of 5 232 pregnant women visiting midwife obstetric units in Cape Town, it was found that 36.9% used alcohol and drugs, 34.9% alcohol only, and 1.6% drugs only.3  Furthermore, a substudy of the Safe Passage Study (SPS) of the PASS (Prenatal Alcohol in Sudden infant death syndrome and Stillbirth) Network, on the value of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein measurements, found that 61% of pregnant women smoked, 55% drank alcohol, and 9% and 5% used marijuana and methamphetamine, respectively.4

These trends underscore the urgency of understanding the potential risks of prenatal cannabis exposure in both global and African settings.



Study Purpose


This systematic review and meta-analysis, published in JAMA Paediatrics on 5 May 2025, aimed to update previous findings by assessing the association between prenatal cannabis use and a range of neonatal outcomes, using newer studies published up to April 2024.
 


Study Methodology
 

The research included 51 cohort and case-control studies covering more than 21 million pregnancies. Studies adjusted for major confounders such as tobacco use. 

Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models, and outcomes were evaluated using the GRADE system to determine the quality of evidence.

 

Findings

The study found that cannabis use during pregnancy was significantly associated with:
 
A 75% increased risk of low birth weight  (95% CI, 1.41–2.18)
• A 52% increased risk of preterm birth ( 95% CI, 1.26–1.83)
An increased risk of 57% in Small for Gestational Age births (95% CI, 1.36–1.81)
 
There was also a modest but statistically significant association with perinatal mortality - 29% (95% CI, 1.07–1.55).

These results reflect an upgrade in the quality of evidence from low to moderate certainty compared to prior reviews.


Conclusion

Prenatal cannabis use is linked to adverse neonatal outcomes, even when accounting for co-exposures such as tobacco. As cannabis becomes more accessible and socially accepted, especially in settings like South Africa, healthcare professionals should incorporate this evidence into antenatal screening and counselling practices. There is also a pressing need for targeted public health messaging and research to understand use trends better and mitigate risks in local contexts.

 

 

Access the original study
 


Disclaimer
This article is compiled from several resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work.  Every effort has been made to attribute quotes and content correctly. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us 


Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.

Rapid SSL

The Medical Education Network
Powered by eLecture, a VisualLive Solution