This summary is intended to provide a snapshot of the original research. It is in no way a substitute for the original research article, nor is it intended to be a complete reflection of the original research.
Originally published in British Journal of General Practice, 21 March 2024
Anxiety is recognized as a potential precursor to Parkinson's disease (PD), but the prospective risk and associated clinical factors remain unclear.
This retrospective cohort study utilized UK primary care data from 2008 to 2018 to assess PD incidence in individuals aged over 50 with new-onset anxiety and identify associated risk factors.
Weibull survival regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-PD onset in anxiety versus non-anxiety groups, adjusting for various factors.
The researchers report that individuals with anxiety had twice the risk of developing PD compared to those without (adjusted HR 2.1, CI: 1.9-2.4), even after accounting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health factors. Among those with anxiety, the presence of depression, hypotension, tremor, rigidity, balance impairment, constipation, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and cognitive impairment increased PD risk.
They conclude that anxiety is associated with a doubled risk of PD development, indicating its potential as a prodromal symptom. Identifying clinical features associated with PD in anxiety patients may aid in early PD detection and intervention.
Disclaimer
This article is compiled from various resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work. Every effort has been made to attribute quotes and content correctly. Where possible, all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us
Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.