Key Take Aways
1. This study found that early termination was associated with a 1.21 times higher hazard of dementia diagnosis when compared to users who had not terminated
2. The association between early metformin termination and dementia was largely independent of changes in HbA1c level and insulin usage
2. The research has implications for diabetes treatment in later life, in particular for those patients who are carriers of APOE ε4 or individuals with a family history of dementia
This summarises an original research article published in JAMA Network Open on 25 October 2024, and reproduced under the CC BY License. This is a summary in no way represents as an original research article. Unless otherwise indicated, all work contained here is implicitly referenced to the original author and trial. Links to all original material can be found at the end of this summary.
Metformin (dimethylbiguanide) has been the preferred first-line agent for type 2 diabetes since its approval for use in the US in 2006.
While numerous trials have suggested that individuals with type 2 diabetes exhibit improved cognitive function and reduced dementia risk when treated with metformin compared to other antidiabetic medications, the precise mechanism underlying these neuroprotective effects remains inconclusive.
Users terminate metformin for various reasons, including in cases of kidney dysfunction, as it is associated with increased mortality in these patients. Less severe side effects, particularly gastrointestinal side effects, are commonly experienced by metformin users, leading to low adherence rates and the replacement of metformin with other antidiabetes agents.
In light of these confounding factors, it was challenging to determine whether there was an association between the incidence of dementia in individuals with type 2 diabetes who did not have renal disease and who had terminated their metformin treatments and, if such an association did exist, whether the dementia incidence was mediated by factors such as haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels or insulin.
The researchers reported the following:
Early terminators exhibited a 1.21 times higher hazard of dementia diagnosis compared to routine users (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.30).
In mediation analysis, the influence of changes in HbA1c level or insulin use on this association varied, ranging from no contribution for insulin use five years after termination to 0.07 years for HbA1c level 1 year after termination.
The findings suggest that the association between early metformin termination and dementia was largely independent of changes in HbA1c level and insulin usage.
Based on their findings, the researchers concluded that terminating metformin treatment was associated with increased dementia incidence in a diverse cohort of older adults.
Much of this association cannot be accounted for by increases in HbA1c levels or insulin use 1 or 5 years after cessation of metformin treatment.
The findings have implications for diabetes treatment in later life, in particular for those patients who are carriers of APOE ε4 or individuals with a family history of dementia. According to their findings, the researchers suggest that for patients encountering gastrointestinal (GIT) side effects with metformin, exploring ways to manage or alleviate those effects might be more beneficial than opting for a treatment replacement.
The study had several limitations, including:
Zimmerman SC, Ferguson EL, Choudhary V, et al. Metformin Cessation and Dementia Incidence. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(10):e2339723. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39723
Reproduced under CC-BY License
Disclaimer
This article is in no way presented as an original work. Every effort has been made to attribute quotes and content correctly. Where possible, all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us
Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here accurately reflects the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out-of-date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.