In Brief | Paediatrics & Neonatology | Endocrine Disorders
Lower IQ scores associated with diabetic ketoacidosis in young type 1 diabetes patients
Time to read: 00:57
Published on MedED: 19 September 2023
Type of article: In Brief
MedED Catalogue Reference: MPIB006
Keywords: cognitive function, diabetic ketoacidosis, early childhood, type 1 diabetes
Sources: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
This is a summary of an article originally published in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism: May 2023. It does not represent the original research, nor is it intended to replace the original research. Access the full Disclaimer Information.
Young children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D) face an increased risk of cognitive deterioration after experiencing diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), although research on cognitive function in T1D primarily focuses on school-age children.
In this 2023 study, the researchers set out to examine whether a single experience of DKA is associated with lower cognitive functioning in young children.
The study, which enrolled 46 newly diagnosed T1D children from 12 sites, aimed to assess IQ scores 2–6 months after DKA at the onset of T1D in children aged 3-5 years. Such a finding would suggest greater susceptibility to cognitive decline in young children.
The findings were as follows:
• Investigators analysed 73 children, noting that patient demographic variables had no statistical difference as a function of DKA status.
• Young children with T1D who experienced diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at ages 3 to 5 had significantly lower IQ scores, irrespective of DKA severity, compared to children who did not experience DKA.
The researchers conclude that these findings suggest that young children with T1D may be particularly susceptible to the negative effects of DKA on cognitive functioning, emphasizing the importance of early diabetes detection and DKA prevention in this age group.
Disclaimer
This article is compiled from a variety of resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work. Every effort has been made to correctly attribute quotes and content. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us
Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.
