In Brief | Antimicrobials 


Optimal Duration of Antibiotic Treatment for Bloodstream Infections


Time to read: 01:57
Time to listen: 04:18
 
Published on MedED: 4 May 2025
Originally Published: 20 November 2024

Source: NEJM
Type of article: In Brief
MedED Catalogue Reference: MIIB017
Category: Antimicrobials
Cross Reference: Infectious Diseases, Critical Care

Keywords: Antimicrobials, AMR, antibiotic stewardship

Key Takeaway
A treatment protocol of seven days of antibiotics was found to be noninferior to 14 days for 90-day mortality in hospitalised adults with bloodstream infections (excluding S. aureus and deep-seated infections).
Top

This article is a review of recent studies originally published in the NEJM,20 November 2024. This article does not represent the original research, nor is it intended to replace the original research. Access the full Disclaimer Information.

  

Watch the 60 Second Summary

(Please let us know if you like this format by clicking here)

 



Listen to Full Article

 



Bloodstream infections (BSIs) carry a high risk of morbidity and mortality. While early and appropriate antimicrobial treatment is essential, the ideal duration of therapy remains a matter of clinical debate.


Study Purpose


This randomised, multicentre, noninferiority study, published in the NEJM, investigated whether a 7-day antibiotic regimen is as effective as a 14-day regimen for hospitalised patients with bloodstream infections, by assessing noninferiority in terms of 90-day all-cause mortality.
 


Study Methodology
 

The study was conducted across 74 hospitals in seven countries. 

Adults admitted to hospital, including those in intensive care, with confirmed bloodstream infections were eligible for inclusion. 

Participants were randomly allocated to receive either 7 or 14 days of antibiotic therapy, with the choice of agent, dose, and route left to the treating clinicians. 

Exclusions included patients with marked immunosuppression, infections needing extended treatment durations, likely contaminants, or Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections. 

The primary endpoint was mortality from any cause within 90 days of diagnosis, with a pre-specified noninferiority margin of 4 percentage points.

 

Findings

A total of 3608 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis—1814 in the 7-day arm and 1794 in the 14-day arm. 

Just over half (55%) were admitted to the ICU at the time of enrolment, with the remainder (45%) in general wards. 

The majority of infections were community-acquired (75.4%), followed by hospital-acquired (13.4%) and ICU-acquired (11.2%). 

Primary infection sources included the urinary tract (42.2%), intra-abdominal sites (18.8%), lungs (13%), vascular access devices (6.3%), and skin/soft tissue (5.2%). 

The following findings were recorded:

At 90 days, mortality was 14.5% in the 7-day group and 16.1% in the 14-day group (absolute difference −1.6 percentage points; 95.7% CI, −4.0 to 0.8), demonstrating noninferiority.

Results were consistent across secondary endpoints and prespecified subgroups.



Conclusion

The findings provide robust evidence supporting the safety of a shorter antibiotic course in a broad hospitalised population with BSI, excluding certain high-risk groups. The consistency across subgroups and outcomes strengthens the validity of the results.

 

 

Access the original study
 


Disclaimer
This article is compiled from several resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work.  Every effort has been made to attribute quotes and content correctly. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us 


Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.

Rapid SSL

The Medical Education Network
Powered by eLecture, a VisualLive Solution