In Brief | Neurology | Radiology


Apixaban vs. Aspirin for Preventing Covert Infarcts in Cryptogenic Stroke: Insights from the ARCADIA-MRI Study


Time to read: 03:16
Time to listen: 06:11
 
Published on MedED: 12 March 2025
Originally Published: 27 January 2025

Source: JAMA Neurology
Type of article: In Brief
MedED Catalogue Reference: MNIB010
Category: Neurology
Cross Reference: Radiology, Gerontology

Keywords: cryptogenic stroke, ARCADIA, apixaban, aspirin, stroke
Key Takeaway

Apixaban was more effective than aspirin in reducing nonlacunar covert infarcts among patients with a recent cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy. Due to the limitations of the study, the researchers indicate that further research is required to validate their findings.
Top

This article is a review of recent studies originally published in the JAMA Neurology, 27 January 2025. This article does not represent the original research, nor is it intended to replace the original research. Access the full Disclaimer Information.

 

Watch the 60 Second Summary

(Please let us know if you like this format by clicking here)

 

 
 



Listen to Full Article

 


Covert brain infarcts (CBI) are small ischemic cerebral lesions detected on MRI without noticeable clinical stroke symptoms.1

They are prevalent in both stroke patients and healthy aging populations. Initially termed "silent infarcts," this label has been reconsidered as subtle clinical effects have been observed. CBI accumulation contributes to cognitive and motor decline, particularly in small vessel disease. Several studies, the most notable of which is the Rotterdam Scan Study, have found that patients with baseline covert infarcts have more than double dementia risk, accelerated cognitive decline, and a two-fold increased risk of future stroke risk, highlighting their impact on long-term neurological health. 2

The ARCADIA study, a large multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, compared apixaban and aspirin in patients with a recent cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy. 3

It found no difference in recurrent stroke rates between the two groups – an annualized recurrence rate of 4.4% in both (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.64-1.55)  - indicating no clear benefit of apixaban over aspirin in preventing recurrent strokes.

However, it remained unclear whether apixaban could reduce the incidence of covert infarcts, which are common in older adults and those with cardiovascular risk factors.

Given the significant association between covert infarcts, dementia, and future stroke risk, the researchers of this study sought to evaluate anticoagulation as a preventive strategy was essential.



Study Purpose
 

To assess whether apixaban is superior to aspirin in preventing nonlacunar covert infarcts in patients with a recent cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy.
 
 


Study Methodology
 

This secondary analysis of the ARCADIA trial involved 174 participants from the ARCADIA-MRI ancillary study, conducted across 75 US sites. 
 
Eligible participants had baseline MRIs and had not permanently discontinued the study drug. 
 
Baseline MRIs were obtained at the time of the index stroke, with follow-up MRIs conducted upon study completion.
 
The primary outcome was the incidence of new nonlacunar covert infarcts, as assessed by two independent raters blinded to treatment allocation. 

Participants received either apixaban (n=79) or aspirin (n=95) and were followed for a median of 27 months.


Findings
 
The mean participant age was 66 years, and 52.3% were male. 
 
The median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 1, indicating slight disability but functional independence. 
 
Over the follow-up period (median 811 days), the incidence of nonlacunar covert infarcts was significantly lower in the apixaban group (5.1%) compared to the aspirin group (17.9%), with a weighted relative risk of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.10-0.83). 
 
The difference remained even after adjusting for potential confounders such as age, sex, and vascular risk factors. 

 
Study Discussion
 
These findings suggest that apixaban may offer neuroprotective benefits by reducing the risk of covert infarcts, even though it did not reduce overt stroke recurrence in the main ARCADIA trial.

Given the known association between covert infarcts and cognitive decline, this could have important implications for long-term patient outcomes. 

It is important to note that the ARCADIA-MRI study had several limitations. Firstly, only 30% of ARCADIA participants were enrolled, with 56% of those having adequate baseline and follow-up scans. Furthermore,  the small sample size led to wide confidence intervals, making the results less definitive. Additionally, while baseline characteristics were mostly balanced, nominal differences between treatment groups may have influenced the outcomes.
 
Finally, the researchers noted that the discordant results between the ARCADIA-MRI and parent trial suggest potential issues with compliance, which could impact the findings.

 

Conclusion

Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of nonlacunar covert infarcts compared to aspirin in patients with cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy. These findings highlight a potential benefit of anticoagulation beyond stroke prevention and warrant further investigation, particularly regarding its role in reducing long-term cognitive decline and improving overall neurological outcomes.

 

Importance of this study for South Africa

Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in  South Africa. Given the high crude stroke mortality rate in rural areas (127/100,000 in people >35 years), investigating silent strokes is crucial for early detection and intervention.4 Preventative therapy, such as Apixaban, could help reduce the risk of stroke and may improve long-term outcomes, refine screening strategies, and ease the burden on South Africa’s healthcare system.


 

Access the original study
 



Additional References

1. Chabriat H. (2020). Covert Brain Infarcts: Look at Extra and Intracranial Vessels. Stroke, 51(1), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027445


Back to top


Disclaimer
This article is compiled from several resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work.  Every effort has been made to attribute quotes and content correctly. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us 


Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.

Rapid SSL

The Medical Education Network
Powered by eLecture, a VisualLive Solution