In Brief | Blood Disorders | Haemophilia

 

Breakthrough in Haemophilia A: Gene Therapy Shows Lasting Benefits in Phase 3 Trial


Time to read: 04:56
Time to listen: 08:51
 
Published on MedED: 5 February 2025
Originally Published: December 2024

Sourced: American Society of Haematology
Type of article: In Brief
MedED Catalogue Reference: MIBRD002
Category: Blood Disorders
Cross Reference: Haemophilia, Gene Therapy

Keywords: haemophilia, gene therapy, vector-therapy
 
Key Takeaway

The AFFINE study provides strong evidence that giroctocogene fitelparvovec could be a transformative one-time gene therapy for haemophilia A, significantly reducing bleeding rates and increasing FVIII activity, potentially improving patient quality of life.

Top

This article is a review of the results of a clinical trial originally presented at the American Society of Haematology, December 2024. This article does not represent the original research, nor is it intended to replace the original research. Access the full Disclaimer Information.



 

 

Physicians may soon have a new tool for managing haemophilia A, as promising early results from an ongoing Phase 3 AFFINE study suggest that giroctocogene fitelparvovec, a one-time gene therapy, could become the second U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved gene therapy for this condition.

Giroctocogene fitelparvovec is a hepatocyte-directed recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 6 (AAV6) vector, which encodes a B-domain-deleted variant of human factor VIII (FVIII).

The findings, presented at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) 2024 Annual Meeting, indicate that the therapy has the potential to provide long-term bleeding control, reducing the need for ongoing FVIII replacement therapy.

If approved, giroctocogene fitelparvovec would follow efanesoctocog alfa, the first FDA-approved gene therapy for haemophilia A, which was authorized in 2023 for both paediatric and adult patient.

 

Editors Note

The term "hepatocyte-directed recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 6 (AAV6) vector" describes a specialized gene therapy delivery system designed to target hepatocytes specifically. This vector is engineered for the efficient expression of therapeutic genes within the liver.
 

  • Recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector: AAV is a non-pathogenic virus that has been genetically modified (recombinant) to prevent replication and disease transmission, ensuring safety during gene delivery. As a viral vector, it acts as a carrier for the gene of interest, facilitating its introduction into human cells.

  • Serotype 6 (AAV6): AAV is classified into different serotypes, each with distinct characteristics. AAV6 is particularly effective at transducing hepatocytes, making it an optimal choice for liver-directed gene therapies, such as those aimed at treating haemophilia A by introducing a functional copy of the factor VIII gene.

In this context, AAV6 vectors offer a promising approach for gene therapies that require long-term expression of therapeutic proteins within the liver.



Study Purpose
 
The AFFINE study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of giroctocogene fitelparvovec compared to standard FVIII prophylaxis. The trial aimed to demonstrate noninferiority and superiority in reducing the total annualized bleeding rate (ABR). As a secondary outcome, researchers aimed to assess FVIII activity levels and reduction in treated bleeds
 



Study Methodology
 

The open-label, multicenter, single-arm trial enrolled 75 adult male participants with moderately severe to severe haemophilia A.
 
Each participant received a one-time intravenous infusion of giroctocogene fitelparvovec at 3e13 vg/kg.
 
Primary endpoint was the reduction in total ABR from Week 12 through at least 15 months post-infusion, compared to pre-treatment FVIII prophylaxis.

Secondary endpoints included FVIII activity levels, the number of treated bleeds, and safety assessments.
 
Participants were monitored for up to 44 months, with ongoing evaluations planned for five years.



Findings


The trial met its primary endpoint, demonstrating a significant reduction in total ABR:
 
Total ABR decreased from 4.73 pre-infusion to 1.24 post-infusion (p = 0.004).
 
Treated bleeds ABR dropped sharply from 4.08 to 0.07 (p < 0.0001).
 
64% of participants had no bleeding events, and 88% had no treated bleeds during follow-up.
 
84% of participants maintained FVIII activity levels >5% at 15 months post-infusion, with most sustaining levels ≥15%.
 
Safety Profile: The therapy was generally well tolerated.
 
Transient elevated FVIII levels were observed in nearly 50% of participants.
 
Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 20% of patients, though most were manageable with clinical intervention.

 
Discussion


The AFFINE study offers compelling evidence that giroctocogene fitelparvovec could be a game-changing one-time gene therapy for haemophilia A. The findings highlight a significant reduction in bleeding rates and a lasting increase in FVIII activity, suggesting that gene therapy could really ease the treatment burden and enhance patients' quality of life.

Of course, individual responses can vary, so it's something to keep in mind, but the safety profile is looking positive overall. Most of the adverse events reported were short-term and manageable. That said, long-term follow-up is still crucial to better understand how durable the FVIII expression is and how it might fit into everyday clinical practice.



Conclusion
 

The growing success of gene therapies in haemophilia marks a major shift away from traditional FVIII replacement treatments. However, challenges such as cost, accessibility, and long-term safety remain key factors in the widespread adoption of these therapies.

 

Importance of this study for South Africa

Gene therapy holds significant promise for South Africa, particularly in addressing conditions like haemophilia A.

Currently, of the 3,142 patients diagnosed with inherited clotting factor deficiencies in the country, 1,986 have haemophilia A. Traditional treatments, such as factor replacement therapy, are not only costly but also require regular administration, posing challenges in resource-limited settings.1,2

The high cost of these treatments often limits accessibility, leading to suboptimal care and increased morbidity. Introducing gene therapy could revolutionize haemophilia management by potentially offering a one-time treatment that provides long-term benefits, thereby reducing the ongoing financial burden on both patients and the healthcare system. 2

While gene therapy research in South Africa has been primarily limited to laboratory-based studies and preclinical trials, the establishment of haemophilia gene therapy programs as extensions of international trials marks a positive step forward. If the costs associated with gene therapy can be controlled, this approach could become a viable and sustainable solution, improving the quality of life for many South Africans living with haemophilia.3

 


 

Access the Original Trial

 ClinicalTrials.gov Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PF-07055480 / Giroctocogene fitelparvovec gene therapy in moderately severe to severe haemophilia A adults (AFFINE)


Additional References

1. Mahlangu, J., Bassa, F., Bassingthwaighte, M., Cruickshank, A.-L., du Plessis, J., Goga, Y., Joubert, J., & Louw, V. (2022). Prophylaxis is the new standard of care in patients with haemophilia. South African Medical Journal, 112(6). https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-m_samj_v112_n6_a7

2. Hendricks, C.L., Alessandrini, M. & Pepper, M.S. Equitable access to cell and gene therapies in South Africa: opportunities and hurdles. Gene Ther 30, 180–186 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41434-021-00309-y

3. Ely, A., Bloom, K., Maepa, M. B., Mahlangu, J. N., Pepper, M. S., & Arbuthnot, P. (2019). Gene and cell therapy in South Africa: Current status and future prospects. South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir 



Back to top


Disclaimer
This article is compiled from several resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work.  Every effort has been made to attribute quotes and content correctly. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us 


Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.

Rapid SSL

The Medical Education Network
Powered by eLecture, a VisualLive Solution