In Brief | Lifestyle Diseases | Pyschiatry
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Risk of Suicide Death
Time to read: 02:01
Time to listen: 04:43
Published on MedED: 6 September 2024
Originally Published: 3 September 2024
Sourced: JAMA Internal Medicine
Type of article: In Brief
MedED Catalogue Reference: MGIB008
Category: Gerontology & Healthy Ageing
Cross Reference: Non-communicable diseases, Mental Health
Keywords: diabetes, GLP-1 antagonists, suicide risk, weight loss, diabetes
Key Takeaway
GLP-1 receptor agonists were not associated with increased risks of self-harm, suicide, or psychiatric disorders such as depression and anxiety.
Top
Originally published in JAMA Internal Medicine, 3 September 2023 This summary does not represent the original research, nor is it intended to replace the original research. Access the full Disclaimer Information
Glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) receptor agonists are widely used to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity, but concerns have arisen regarding potential links to suicidality and self-harm.
In July 2023, the European Medicines Agency launched an investigation after receiving around 150 reports of suicidal thoughts and self-harm possibly related to the drug. GLP-1 receptor agonists can cross the blood-brain barrier, and GLP-1 receptors are present in the central nervous system, making an effect on suicidality plausible. While previous studies have linked weight-loss interventions to suicide risk, some suggest that GLP-1 receptor agonists may actually protect against depression.
In this study published in JAMA Internal Medicine (3 September 2024), researchers aimed to assess the potential association between the use of glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) receptor agonists and the risk of suicide death.
To determine the above, they conducted a comparative analysis between adult patients aged 18-24 who were using either a GLP-1 receptor agonist or a comparator sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor. The active-comparator new-user cohort design obtained the data from nationwide register data from Sweden and Denmark covering the period from 2013 to 2021.
Key findings include:
- 124,517 adults initiated GLP-1 receptor agonists, while 174,036 initiated SGLT2 inhibitors
- The mean age was 60 years, and 45% were female
- During an average follow-up of 2.5 years, there were 77 suicide deaths among GLP-1 receptor agonist users and 71 among SGLT2 inhibitor users
- The weighted incidence of suicide deaths was slightly higher for GLP-1 receptor agonists (0.23 vs 0.18 per 1000 person-years), but the hazard ratio (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.83-1.88) was not statistically significant
The researchers broadly concluded that no association was found between GLP-1 receptor agonist use and nonfatal self-harm or new cases of depression and anxiety-related disorders. The study concluded that GLP-1 receptor agonists do not significantly increase the risk of suicide, self-harm, or psychiatric disorders.
It is important to note the following study limitations: while adjustments were made for confounders, such as psychiatric disorders and socioeconomic status, unmeasured factors could have influenced the results. The study predominantly involved GLP-1 receptor agonist users with type 2 diabetes, limiting generalizability to non-diabetic patients using the drugs for obesity.
The small number of suicide events in subgroup analyses, varying drug usage patterns, and a relatively short follow-up period (mean 2.7 years) may have limited the study's ability to detect long-term risks. Misclassification of suicide deaths and underreporting of nonfatal self-harm also contribute to potential bias in the findings.
Access the original research article
Ueda, P., Söderling, J., Wintzell, V., Svanström, H., Pazzagli, L., Eliasson, B., Melbye, M., Hviid, A., & Pasternak, B. (2024). GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Risk of Suicide Death. JAMA internal medicine, e244369. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.4369
Back to top
Disclaimer
This article is compiled from several resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work. Every effort has been made to attribute quotes and content correctly. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us
Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.