Estimated Read Time: 7 minutes, 49 seconds
Originally Published in the International Journal of Emergency Medicine (18 July 2024) reproduced under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This is a summary of the original clinical study and in no way represents the original research. Links to all original material can be found in the body of this summary.
Key Take Aways
1. The association between age and mortality in critical care settings is well-established
2. Undetectable serum epinephrine, which is more common in older patients, contributes to poor outcomes in these patients
3. The use of epinephrine might improve the clinical prognosis in older surgical patients with shock
Back to top
This prospective observational cohort study reviewed data from 90 patients who had been admitted to the ICU for post-operative care
• The majority of the patients were men [62 (68.9%)]; 28 (31.1%) were women
• Trauma patients (n =60) accounted for 66.7% of the admissions, and non-trauma patients (n=30) accounted for the remaining 33.3%
• All patients underwent emergency surgery
• 60 patients (66.7%) required mechanical ventilation
o Among the cohort, 44 patients (73%) were trauma cases, all of whom required mechanical ventilation within 24 hours prior to ICU admission
o The remaining 16 patients (27%) were non-trauma cases, with two of these patients requiring mechanical ventilation more than 48 hours before ICU admission
Data Collection
The following data was collected from ICU admission records and blood samples:
• Demographic data, including gender and age
• Pre-existing conditions, including diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, immunosuppression, congestive heart failure, coronary insufficiency, chronic kidney disease, or cancer
• Results from Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score III (SAPS III) at admission.
• Information related to the use of mechanical ventilation in ICU
• The use of vasoactive drugs such as norepinephrine (µg/kg per minute), epinephrine (µg/kg per minute), and vasopressin (units per hour)
• Surgical site (abdomen, brain, chest, or extremity).
Levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine
The following were recorded:
• Serum levels of both epinephrine and norepinephrine exhibited significant variability, with standard deviations approximately 3 and 2 times greater than their respective means
• The mean levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine were considerably higher than the corresponding median values and third quartiles, contributing to the skewed distribution of these variables
• Notably, 60 (66.7%) of the 90 patients had undetectable serum levels of epinephrine, and as a result, these values were excluded from the calculation of descriptive statistics
• Undetectable serum epinephrine levels were predominantly observed in older patients receiving treatment with vasoactive drugs
Epinephrine Detection
On admission, the following was recorded:
• 34 patients were not receiving any vasoactive drugs
• 46 were receiving norepinephrine, vasopressin, or both, and eight were also receiving epinephrine
• Of the 60 patients who presented with undetectable serum levels of epinephrine – none were receiving exogenous epinephrine infusion
• Of the 46 patients who were receiving both vasopressin, norephedrine or both, serum ephedrine was detectable only in 36 (43,9%) individuals
• Seven of the patients who presented with the highest serum levels of epinephrine at admission were receiving exogenous epinephrine infusion
Age and serum levels of epinephrine
To assess whether age influenced the relationship between undetectable serum epinephrine levels and the administration of vasopressin or norepinephrine, the researchers compared outcomes between patients aged ≤ 60 years and those > 60 years.
• In patients over 60 years of age, the use of vasoactive drugs was significantly associated with undetectable epinephrine levels (OR [95% CI] = 6.36 [1.12, 36.08], p = 0.05).
• An additional significant relationship was observed between serum epinephrine levels, the administration of vasoactive drugs, and the type of surgery performed
Among the 90 patients analysed, 29 (32.2%) underwent brain surgery, 19 (21.1%) thoracic surgery, 26 (28.9%) abdominal surgery, and 17 (18.9%) extremity surgery.
o In patients undergoing brain surgery, 89% of those who received some form of norepinephrine and vasopressin had undetectable serum epinephrine levels, compared to 60% of those who did not receive these drugs.
o In thoracic surgery patients, serum epinephrine levels were similarly undetectable in 77% of individuals, compared to the 47% of individuals who did not receive these drugs
In hospital mortality and serum levels of epinephrine
Of the patients who had undetectable levels of epinephrine, the in-hospital mortality was higher among patients with a norepinephrine level ≥ 2006.5 pg/mL (OR [95% CI] = 4.00 [1.27, 12.58]), p = 0.03)
There was, however, was, no evidence to suggest an association between serum norepinephrine levels and in-hospital mortality when epinephrine was detectable
In the > 60-year age group, the mortality rate was 47.6%, compared with 20.8% in the ≤ 60-year age group (OR [95% CI] = 3.45 [1.37, 8.70], p = 0.01)
• Mortality was higher among patients with norepinephrine levels above 2006.5 pg/mL (OR [95% CI] = 2.94 [1.13, 7.64], p = 0.02)
It also demonstrated that patients with undetectable serum epinephrine and serum norepinephrine levels ≥2006.5 pg/mL had a higher risk of death. The findings suggest that patients with a lower intrinsic sympathetic response might face worse outcomes and require more vasopressors in critical care settings.
Catecholamine secretion relies on the adaptation of chromaffin cells in the adrenal medulla through mechanisms such as neurotransmission at the cholinergic splanchnic–adrenal synapse, intercellular communication, and activation of voltage-gated calcium channels.
Disruptions in these mechanisms are common in critically ill patients, with up to 20% of critically ill patients and 60% of those with sepsis experiencing hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis dysfunction, abolishing or reducing the intensity of cortisol activity. The study aligned with previous findings that this dysfunction is more pronounced in patients over 60 years of age. 3,4,5
Moreover, the increased likelihood of undetectable epinephrine levels in patients over 60 years old aligns with the established understanding that hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis dysfunction is more common in critically ill individuals within this age group, as reported by Rushworth et al.5 and the study by Johansson et al.1, which found lower epinephrine levels in older trauma patients.
Access the original research
Suh, J.I., da Roza, D.L., Cadamuro, F.M. et al. Catecholamine concentration as a predictor of mortality in emergency surgical patients. Int J Emerg Med 17, 95 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00676-4
Reproduced under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
1. Brattström O, Granath F, Rossi P, Oldner A. Early predictors of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients treated in the intensive care unit.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(8):1007-1017. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02266.x
2. Johansson PI, Stensballe J, Rasmussen LS, Ostrowski SR. High circulating adrenaline levels at admission predict increased mortality after trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(2):428-436. doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e31821e0f93
3. Rushworth RL, Torpy DJ, Falhammar H. Adrenal crises in older patients. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(7):628-639. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30122-4
4. Rushworth, R. L., Goubar, T., Ostman, C., McGrath, S., & Torpy, D. J. (2020). Interaction between hypotension and age on adrenal crisis diagnosis. Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 4(2), e00205. https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.205
5. Cooper, M. S., & Stewart, P. M. (2003). Corticosteroid insufficiency in acutely ill patients. The New England journal of medicine, 348(8), 727–734. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra020529
Disclaimer
This article is in no way presented as an original work. Every effort has been made to attribute quotes and content correctly. Where possible, all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us
Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here accurately reflects the original material. Should you find inaccuracies or out-of-date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the Contact Us form to notify us.