Key Take Aways
1. Residual inflammatory risk, measured by high-sensitivity CRP, strongly predicts adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in patients on modern statin therapy.
2. Residual cholesterol risk, indicated by LDLC levels, has a minor impact on cardiovascular events but influences cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in statin-treated patients.
3. Consistency in findings across diverse trials underscores the robustness of associations between CRP and LDLC levels and cardiovascular outcomes.
4. Clinical attention should focus on assessing and managing residual inflammatory risk to enhance cardiovascular outcomes in statin-treated patients
5. Integrating CRP and LDLC levels in risk assessment facilitates personalized strategies to mitigate cardiovascular risk and improve patient outcomes during statin therapy.
This summarises an original research article which first appeared in the Lancet on the 6th March 2024. It does not replace the original work, which has been linked below.
Inflammation and hyperlipidaemia jointly contribute to atherothrombotic disease. However, in patients undergoing intensive statin therapy, the balance of influences of the two on future cardiovascular events may shift, which could have implications for the selection of additional cardiovascular treatments.
Back to top
In patients who were currently on statin therapy, assessing inflammation using high-sensitivity CRP proved more reliable in predicting cardiovascular events and mortality than cholesterol assessment via LDLC.
These results underscore the importance of considering additional treatments alongside statins, suggesting that combining aggressive lipid-lowering with inflammation-inhibiting therapies may be essential for further reducing atherosclerotic risk.
Clinical trial registration no. PROMINENT (NCT03071692), REDUCE-IT (NCT01492361), or STRENGTH (NCT02104817) trials.
Ridker PM, Bhatt DL, Pradhan AD, et al Inflammation and cholesterol as predictors of cardiovascular events among patients receiving statin therapy: a collaborative analysis of three randomised trials. The Lancet 2023:401(10384):p1293-1301.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00215-5
Disclaimer
This article is in no way presented as an original work. Every effort has been made to attribute quotes and content correctly. Where possible, all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us
Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here accurately reflects the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out-of-date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.