Originally published In The Lancet Infectious Diseases: September 2023
This open-label, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial aimed to evaluate potential immunological interference when nOPV2 and bOPV are administered together.
Healthy infants aged 6 weeks were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive nOPV2 only, nOPV2 plus bOPV, or bOPV only, at the ages of 6 weeks, 10 weeks, and 14 weeks.
244 received nOPV2 only
246 received nOPV2 plus bOPV, and
246 received bOPV only
The primary objective was to assess the cumulative immune response to all three poliovirus types at 14 weeks following two doses of the respective vaccine.
The following findings were recorded after the two doses:
209 (86%) participants in the nOPV2-only group and 159 (65% ) participants in the nOPV2 plus bOPV group had a type 2 poliovirus immune response
227 (92%) participants in the nOPV2 plus bOPV group and 229 (93%) participants in the bOPV-only group had a type 1 response
216 (88%;) participants in the nOPV2 plus bOPV group and 212 (86%) participants in the bOPV only group had a type 3 response
Co-administration was non-inferior to single administration for types 1 and 3 but not for type 2
There were 15 serious adverse events (including three deaths, one in each group, all attributable to sudden infant death syndrome); none were attributed to vaccination.
The findings revealed that the simultaneous administration of nOPV2 and bOPV had an impact on the immunogenicity specifically related to poliovirus Type 2, but did not affect Types 1 and 3. The diminished immunogenicity observed with nOPV2 when co-administered raises concerns about the feasibility of employing this strategy for vaccination purposes.
Access the original article
Wilkinson A.L., Zaman K., Hoque M., et al. Immunogenicity of novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 administered concomitantly with bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, ISSN: 1473-3099, 23 (9): 1062-1071
Disclaimer
This article is compiled from a variety of resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work. Every effort has been made to correctly attribute quotes and content. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us
Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.