In Brief | Comparative study of diagnostic efficacy of sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens in community-acquired pneumonia children treated with fiberoptic bronchoscopy

 

Published on MedED: 14 September 2023
Type of article: In Brief
MedED Catalogue Reference: MII010

Keywords: community-acquired pneumonia,CAP, pneumonia, bronchoalveolar lavage
Sources: BMC Infectious Diseases 


Originally published In BMC Infectious Diseases: 29 August 2023
 

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) poses a significant threat to childhood health worldwide, emphasizing the importance of selecting the right respiratory specimen for diagnosis. Traditionally, sputum and upper respiratory secretions like nasal and pharyngeal swabs have been used, but contamination from upper respiratory pathogens has been a concern.
 

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has emerged as a valuable diagnostic tool for pneumonia, known for its lower susceptibility to oral microorganism contamination. However, a comprehensive comparison between induced sputum (IS) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for pathogen detection has been lacking.
 

This study examined 142 hospitalized children undergoing bronchoalveolar lavage, analysing paired sputum and BALF samples via multiplex PCR to detect nine viruses and two atypical bacteria. This approach allowed for a more thorough assessment of the molecular results obtained from different respiratory specimens for multiple pathogens.


The following findings were recorded:

An overall positivity rate of 85.9% for sputum and 80.3% for BALF, with a high agreement for detecting certain pathogens such as M. pneumoniae, influenza A, influenza B, bocavirus, and RSV. 

Adenovirus exhibited a low agreement level and a high false-negative rate, while rhinovirus had a significant false-positive rate.

In 59.9% of cases, multiplex PCR results were consistent, with single detections being more common than mixed detection.
 

These results suggest that the consistency of results between sputum and BALF varies by pathogen, emphasizing the need for caution when considering sputum as a substitute for BALF, especially in young children or when co-infections with bacteria are suspected.



Access the original article 

Wang, L., Lu, S., Guo, Y. et al. Comparative study of diagnostic efficacy of sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens in community-acquired pneumonia children treated with fiberoptic bronchoscopy. BMC Infect Dis 23, 565 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08522-3

 

 


Disclaimer
This article is compiled from a variety of resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work.  Every effort has been made to correctly attribute quotes and content. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us 


Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.

Rapid SSL

The Medical Education Network
Powered by eLecture, a VisualLive Solution