Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (LiGHT) Trial: Six-Year Results of Primary Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty versus Eye Drops for the Treatment of Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
 
Published on MedED: 13 September 2023
Type of article: In Brief
MedED Catalogue Reference: MOIB006

Keywords: Glaucoma, intraocular pressure, retinal diseases, ophthalmology, laser trabeculoplasty, ocular hypertension, selective progression of glaucoma, eye drops, LiGHT trial
Sources: Opthalmology

Original Published In Opthalmology: February 2023
 

This research extends on the initial results of the 2019 Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (LiGHT) trial.
 

The LiGHT trial was a prospective multicenter randomised controlled trial which compared the results of treating patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension(OHT) with either selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) or intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering eye drops. The trial found that the use of SLT was a more cost-effective solution in both OHT and OAG patients three years after initial treatment. In addition, patients treated with SLT did not require additional drops and had a reduced rate of glaucoma surgeries and a very low rate of adverse events.
 

In this study, Gazzard et al. set out to determine whether these results were replicated after a more extended period, identified as six years from the initiation of treatment. Their primary outcome was to assess the health-related quality of life measures; their secondary objective was to measure the initial treatment's clinical effectiveness and adverse events.
 

Of the 692 patients completing three years in the LiGHT Trial, 633 patients (91.5%) entered the extension, and 524 patients completed 6 years in the trial (82.8% of those entering the extension phase). 


The study found the following:

“No significant differences were found for the EuroQol EQ-5D 5 Levels, Glaucoma Utility Index, and Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 (P > 0.05 for all) for either treatment with SLT or the IOP eye drops.

The SLT arm showed better Glaucoma Symptom Scale scores than the eye drops arm (83.6 ± 18.1 vs. 81.3 ± 17.3, respectively).

69.8% of eyes in the SLT arm remained at or less than the target IOP without medical or surgical treatment. 

More eyes in the drops arm exhibited disease progression (26.8% vs. 19.6%, respectively; P = 0.006). 

Trabeculectomy was required in 32 eyes in the drops arm compared with 13 eyes in the SLT arm (P < 0.001); more cataract surgeries occurred in the drops arm (95 compared with 57 eyes; P = 0.03). 

No laser-related severe adverse events occurred.”


The researchers concluded that selective laser trabeculoplasty provided better long-term disease control than initial drop therapy for patients with OAG and OHT. These patients required less incisional glaucoma and cataract surgery over the 6-year study period, and the treatment was more cost-effective and safer


Access the original article 
 

1. Gazzard, G., Konstantakopoulou, E., Garway-Heath, D., Adeleke, M., Vickerstaff, V., Ambler, G., Hunter, R., Bunce, C., Nathwani, N., Barton, K., & LiGHT Trial Study Group (2023). Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (LiGHT) Trial: Six-Year Results of Primary Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty versus Eye Drops for the Treatment of Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension. Ophthalmology, 130(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.09.009

 

 

 


Disclaimer
This article is compiled from a variety of resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work.  Every effort has been made to correctly attribute quotes and content. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us 


Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.

Rapid SSL

The Medical Education Network
Powered by eLecture, a VisualLive Solution