Management of blunt pancreatic trauma: what's new?

 

Published on MedED:  30 August 21
Type of article: Clinical Article Summary

MedED Catalogue Reference: MCC002
Compiler: Linda Ravenhill
Sources: Eur J Trauma Emergency Sur

Pancreatic injuries, both blunt and traumatic, are relatively uncommon, occurring in 0.2–2 % of all trauma patients and 3–12 % of patients with an abdominal injury. Nevertheless, these injuries are associated with significant mortality, primarily due to concomitant or related injuries. In instances of pancreas-specific mortality, the most critical diagnostic question relates to injury to the main pancreatic duct, associated as it is with higher mortality and morbidity.
 
Following penetrating abdominal trauma, diagnosis of such injury is most often only made at the time of laparotomy. In patients without an indication for urgent laparotomy, diagnosis can therefore be a challenge. The retroperitoneal location of the pancreas additionally may cause the clinical signs of pancreatic injury to be subtle and become apparent only later in the post-injury course, as pancreatic secretions become activated and pancreatic and peri-pancreatic inflammation increases. Serum amylase determination is the most widely used laboratory test to aid in the diagnosis. It is, however, neither sensitive nor specific. Due to the aforementioned retroperitoneal location of the pancreas, both diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and ultrasonography have likewise proven relatively insensitive in detecting pancreatic injury.
 
In terms of imaging modalities, Computed tomography (CT) is a similarly imperfect diagnostic aid. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and more recently, Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), are both proving to be more efficient imaging tools in diagnosing these injuries.
 
Regarding management the status of the pancreatic duct, the location of injury (proximal versus distal), and the patient's overall status are the major determinants of the appropriate course of treatment.Recent literature has favoured simplified protocols utilizing external drainage and distal pancreatectomy rather than more complex procedures. In terms of innovations: Fibrin glue and other sealants have been reviewed with respect to their ability to decrease the incidence of pancreatic leak/fistula in elective cases. No clear benefit was established for
this approach.
 
Octreotide, an eight-amino-acid synthetic analogue of somatostatin, has however been shown to reduce morbidity and enhance closure of pancreatic fistulae after elective pancreatic resections for cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Surgery remains the elected treatment approach for main pancreatic ductal injury, with distal pancreatectomy preferred for most injuries and more conservative surgical management for proximal ductal injuries involving the head of the pancreas.

 
Access the original research investigation here

Management of blunt pancreatic trauma: what's next?      
 

Summary reproduced with kind permission from MedSpec Publishing.
References
Potoka DA, Gaines BA, Leppäniemi A, Peitzman AB. Management of blunt pancreatic trauma: what's new?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41(3):239-250. doi:10.1007/s00068-015-0510-3

Accessed June 2019. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26038029/
 
Contributor: Linda Ravenhill
Linda Ravenhill is a medical professional with an MA in Journalism. She has worked in the medical, technology and digital development spaces for over 25 years, & has a particular interest in the impact of technology on the delivery of healthcare in the Sub-Saharan Africa region.

Disclaimer
This article is compiled from a variety of resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work.  Every effort has been made to correctly attribute quotes and content. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us 


Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.
Rapid SSL

The Medical Education Network
Powered by eLecture, a VisualLive Solution