Beta-blockers have long been a cornerstone in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the evidence supporting their use primarily stems from clinical studies conducted in the pre-reperfusion era, before the widespread adoption of anti-platelet drugs, statins, and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. These newer interventions have significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality in AMI patients.
In the current reperfusion era, the benefit of beta-blockers remains clear only for patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤40%). For those with mildly reduced or preserved EF, the optimal duration and overall benefit of oral beta-blocker therapy remain questionable, largely due to the absence of randomized clinical trials addressing this specific population.1
This recent multicenter, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial sought to evaluate the effects of interrupting long-term beta-blocker treatment in patients with a history of uncomplicated myocardial infarction.
The study enrolled 3,698 patients randomising them in a 1:1 ratio: 1,846 patients were assigned to interrupt their beta-blocker therapy, while 1,852 were assigned to continue treatment. The median time from the most recent myocardial infarction to randomization was 2.9 years.
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants were required to have a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 40% and no history of cardiovascular events in the six months preceding their enrollment.
Endpoints:
The primary endpoint was a composite measure encompassing death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons.
The main secondary endpoint assessed changes in quality of life, measured using the European Quality of Life – 5 Dimensions questionnaire.
The following findings were recorded:
1. Primary Outcome:
A primary outcome event occurred in 432 of 1,812 patients (23.8%) in the interruption group, compared to 384 of 1,821 patients (21.1%) in the continuation group.
This reflected a risk difference of 2.8 percentage points and a 16% higher hazard ratio (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.33; P=0.44 for non-inferiority).
2. Quality of Life:
The study found no significant improvement in patient's quality of life following the interruption of beta-blocker treatment.
This trial demonstrates that for patients with a history of myocardial infarction and preserved left ventricular function, the interruption of long-term beta-blocker therapy was not non-inferior to the continuation of treatment.
These findings suggest that ongoing beta-blocker therapy may play a crucial role in effectively managing cardiovascular risks in this patient population. However, further research is warranted to elucidate the optimal duration and specific patient subgroups that may benefit most from long-term beta-blocker therapy in the contemporary era of cardiac care.