News Desk | NHI
Motsoaledi Stands Firm on NHI's Section 33 Amidst Growing Opposition from GNU and Private SectorTime to read: 01:00 minutes
Type of article: News
MedED Catalogue Reference: MNHI0011
Category: News
Category Cross-reference: NHI| Health Policy
Keywords: NHI
Top
28 August 2024, 09:30
Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi is unwavering in his stance on Section 33 of the NHI Act, which restricts medical aids to covering only top-up services not covered by the NHI.
Despite concerns from opposition parties within the government of National Unity (GNU), who argue that the clause is potentially unconstitutional and limits consumer choice, Motsoaledi insists that removing Section 33 would undermine the entire NHI system.
The Democratic Alliance (DA) has identified this section as a major obstacle in their health plan and a deal-breaker in the GNU negotiations. However, Motsoaledi remains firm, indicating that the ANC is not in a formal alliance with the DA, and any collapse of the GNU due to disagreements would be unfortunate.
The private healthcare sector, including Business Unity South Africa (Busa) and the South African Medical Association (SAMA), also opposes the NHI's current direction, leading to their refusal to sign the second presidential health compact. They argue that the compact has been transformed into an explicit endorsement of the NHI without proper consultation.
Despite these tensions, Motsoaledi is open to amending other parts of the Act, particularly those affecting access to HIV treatment for asylum seekers and undocumented migrants. However, he remains committed to implementing the NHI as envisioned.
26 August 2024 | Business and healthcare groups continue to reject the current form of the Presidential Health Compact
15 August 2024 | Business Unity SA's Opposition Forces Delay of Second Presidential Health Compact
8 August 2024 | Latest NHI Court ruling: Solidarity 1, Department of Health 0
Access more in our Special NHI Coverage
Back to top
Disclaimer
This article is compiled from various resources researched and compiled by the contributor. It is in no way presented as an original work. Every effort has been made to correctly attribute quotes and content. Where possible all information has been independently verified. The Medical Education Network bears no responsibility for any inaccuracies which may occur from the use of third-party sources. If you have any queries regarding this article contact us
Fact-checking Policy
The Medical Education Network makes every effort to review and fact-check the articles used as source material in our summaries and original material. We have strict guidelines in relation to the publications we use as our source data, favouring peer-reviewed research wherever possible. Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained here is an accurate reflection of the original material. Should you find inaccuracies, out of date content or have any additional issues with our articles, please make use of the contact us form to notify us.
